And yet, when I and other advocates of sensible gun
regulation have rolled out these statistics, and the gun guys have nowhere to
turn in their attempt to discredit them, they inevitably turn to a red herring
argument which basically boils down to this:
"Yes, those gun death stats are awful, but vehicular deaths are
worse, so we should ignore the gun stats unless you want to ban all cars,"
or some such false argument meant to derail the debate.
Consider the following, from a February 2011 Oregon Public
Broadcasting radio show, with a debate between Penny Okamoto, executive
director of Ceasefire Oregon, and
Kevin Starrett, executive director of the extremist organization, Oregon
Firearms Federation, which
I blogged on previously:
[host] Emily Harris then goes on to
mention one comment on their blog comparing gun deaths to deaths by cars,
suggesting "car" and "gun" could be used interchangeably in
conversation.
Starrett once again sees little
difference: "I think there is an important parallel here. Cars
kill far more people than guns do, and yet if on the many occasions, daily
occasions, when we hear of people being killed in car accidents, many of which
were caused by gross negligence by people or teenagers drinking or that kind of
thing -- in the wake of a story like that, you would never invite a
representative from AAA to come on and defend car ownership." Later
adding, "You wouldn't see me coming and demanding that Penny give up her
driver's license."
Okamoto responded, "It's a
parallel that is pulled out only when it's useful. Guns are made to kill
people. Cars are not. Cars are basically for transportation.
Sometimes people do die in car accidents. One of the reasons that the
number of people dying in car accidents has decreased is because so many people
have worked on making cars safer and making people safer drivers. The gun
lobby doesn't work on making guns safer. ... There's no license, no registration,
no requirement for training [for guns]. Anyone can buy a gun from anyone
in Oregon. You don't have to be a licensed firearms dealer."
Then, as a further analogy, she adds, "And there's an interesting parallel
that wishes to be made. If we put children in car seats when they're in
cars, then why can't we have some type of law that prevents children from
gaining access to weapons, or more preferably, makes gun owners more
responsible. If you have a gun, you own it, and some child accesses it,
you're responsible. You have to be a responsible gun owner."
I would also add that the overwhelming majority of deaths in
cars is due to accidents, not homicides or suicides, whereas the reverse is
true for guns.
On my long list of topics to pursue, I have long wanted to
do a deep dive into the statistics. What
little I've done haven't looked good for the gun lobby. Add to this that the number of fatal
shootings are rising, ever so slightly, despite reducing numbers of gun owners,
while fatal driving accidents are decreasing, despite increases in the number
of drivers.
Today the ViolencePolicy Center announced a new report, which illustrates my point quite nicely. Gun-related
deaths now outpace car-related deaths in 10 states. From a press release:
A new
Violence Policy Center (VPC) state-by-state analysis
of government data comparing firearm deaths and motor vehicle deaths shows that
gun deaths outpaced motor vehicle deaths in 10 states in 2009, the most recent
year for which state level data is available. The 10 states which
experienced more firearm deaths than motor vehicle deaths in 2009 are: Alaska,
Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Virginia, and
Washington (see alphabetical listing of states with mortality figures
below). Nationally, there were 31,236 firearm deaths in 2009 and 36,361
motor vehicle deaths according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
Here is a breakdown of the numbers, from that report:
Here is an informative graph which shows nationwide numbers
of car-related deaths is falling in recent years, almost down to the number of
gun-related deaths, which is rising slightly:
Excerpts from the report:
In 2010, the number of fatalities in motor vehicle traffic
crashes continued their steady decline for a total of 35,080.b
This drop took place despite a
significant increase in the number of miles Americans drove.c
More than 90 percent of American households own a cari while fewer than a third of American households contain a gun.j And yet, if charted out year-by-year as
seen in the graph on the prior page, deaths nationwide from these two consumer
products are on a trajectory to intersect.
The report goes on to comment on the
large number of safety improvements and regulations of cars (such as seat belts
and seat belt laws, shatter-resistant windshields, speed restrictions, child
seats, etc.) which have greatly reduced deaths by car, yet there has been no
such safety regulation of guns and ammo, and regulation of guns remains very
lax.
I urge you to visit the link and read
the report for yourself, but here I will post, verbatim, the conclusion from
the report:
Ten states already experience gun death rates that exceed
their motor vehicle-related death rates. If current trends continue, the number of
states where gun deaths outpace motor vehicles deaths will only increase.
The historic drop in motor vehicle deaths illustrates how
health and safety regulation can reduce deaths and injuries that were at one time thought to
be unavoidable.
Such an approach to injury prevention has been applied to
every product Americans come into contact with every day—except for guns. And as is the
case with motor vehicles, health and safety regulation could reduce deaths and injuries
associated with firearms.
Comprehensive regulation of the firearms industry and its
products could include: minimum safety standards (i.e., specific design standards
and the requirement of safety devices); bans on certain types of firearms such as “junk guns” and
military-style assault weapons; limits on firepower; restrictions on gun possession by those
convicted of a violent misdemeanor; heightened restrictions on the carrying of loaded guns in
public; improved enforcement of current laws restricting gun possession by persons with histories of
domestic violence; more detailed and timely data collection on gun production, sales, use in
crime, involvement in injury and death; and, public education about the extreme risks associated
with exposure to firearms.
America is reaping the benefits of decades of successful
injury prevention strategies on its highways, but continues to pay an unacceptable, yet equally
preventable, price in lives lost every year to gun violence.
Here is a related article on this study, published by the Tucson Sentinal. VPC executive director, Kristen Rand, is quoted in the article:
"Americans are reaping the benefits
of smart safety regulation of motor vehicles. The idea that gun deaths exceed
motor vehicle deaths in 10 states is stunning when one considers that 90 percent
of American households own a car while fewer than a third own firearms," said the group's legislative director, Kristen Rand.
"It is
also important to consider that motor vehicles—unlike guns—are essential to
the functioning of the entire U.S. economy. It is time to end firearms’ status
as the last unregulated consumer product," she said.
UPDATE (6/12/12): A good related article, with excellent statistics, by "Art on Issues": http://www.artonissues.com/2012/06/guns-vs-cars-would-you-send-your-child-there/.
UPDATE (10/10/12): Gun Deaths have now surpassed death by automobile in Washington D.C., Maryland, and Virginia (= "DMV"):
http://www.vpc.org/press/1210dmv.htm . From that link:
The analysis, which uses the most recent complete data available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, reveals that in 2010--
- Gun deaths in the DMV totaled 1,512 while motor vehicles deaths totaled 1,280.
- In the District of Columbia there were 99 firearm deaths reported in 2010, 84 of which were identified as homicides and 13 of which were identified as suicides. That same year, there were 38 motor vehicle deaths in the District.
- In Maryland, there were 538 firearm deaths reported in 2010, 306 of which were identified as homicides and 222 of which were identified as suicides. That same year, there were 514 motor vehicle deaths in the state.
- In Virginia, there were 875 firearm deaths reported in 2010, 271 of which were identified as homicides, 576 of which were identified as suicides, and 13 of which were identified as unintentional deaths. That same year, there were 728 motor vehicle deaths in the state.
Nationally, there were 31,672 firearm deaths reported in 2010. That same year there were 35,498 motor vehicle deaths nationwide.
UPDATE (5/13/13): A related article about Washington State's gun death statistics topping those from cars.
UPDATE (4/8/15): Another state, Tennessee, has also joined the ranks of states with higher gun deaths than automobile deaths, bringing the total now to at least 18 states. From the article:
"The analysis found that in 2013, there were 17 states where there were more gun deaths than motor vehicle deaths: Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming, along with the District of Columbia," the center said in a news release sent out Tuesday. "More than 90 percent of American households own a car while fewer than a third of American households have a gun.
"Americans' exposure to motor vehicles vastly outweighs their exposure to firearms. Yet nationwide, there were 33,636 gun deaths and 35,612 motor vehicle deaths in 2013."
.
A statement from Ceasefire Oregon...
