I
just read a blog post at Random
Musings, where the author wonders what
the “magic number” of gun deaths is to lead to real action. In his words:
I don't know if anyone from the NRA/gun lobby
will read this, or would dare to admit it if they did, but if they happen to do
so, I have a couple of questions for them -
How many guns have to be sold before your benefactors in the firearms industry find that even their unbridled avarice is met?
How many innocent people have to die before your bloodlust is satiated?
How many guns have to be sold before your benefactors in the firearms industry find that even their unbridled avarice is met?
How many innocent people have to die before your bloodlust is satiated?
It’s
a good question. When confronted with
all the horrifying numbers, the gun extremists write it off as “the cost of
freedom,” or attribute all the shootings only to gangs or drug dealers or the
random mentally ill loonies out there.
The NRA doesn’t seem to care, as long as the “donations” from
gun and ammo manufacturers keep rolling in.
So
what does it take for the NRA to agree to stricter gun regulation, as they used
to before extremists took over in the late 70s?
You remember, back when the NRA was actually more about gun safety and
hunting than it was about politics? They
actually supported and proposed some of the earlier pro-control gun
regulations.
How
many deaths does it take for our legislators to stop listening to the NRA?
How
many deaths does it take for citizens to stand up and demand the legislators
pay attention? After all, the
VAST majority of citizens, including gun owners, support stronger
regulation, such as background checks for all gun sales, blocking terrorists on
the terrorist watch list, and bans on assault weapons and high-cap ammo
magazines.
I
mean, isn’t it enough already that there are 100,000
people shot a year in America? That’s
270 people shot each day, in homicides, assaults, suicides, and accidents, and 87
of them die. 33 of them are murdered. Aren’t those numbers shocking enough? The gun lobby insists that “an armed society
is a polite society” as the bumpersticker slogan says, but we are already the
most armed country of them all. Their
way hasn’t worked.
Isn’t
it enough that we lead the
advanced world in gun-related deaths?
…that
we have more
gun deaths in a year than during any war since WWII, including
Vietnam?
…that
there are more
gun deaths in the U.S. each year than death by any means in war-torn Somalia or
Yemen?
…that
there are now more
gun deaths in 10 states than car deaths, with other states coming close to
even?
..
that we
now have multiple mass murders every month, whereas years pass between them
in most advanced nations.
So,
what will it take?? At what point will
our leaders take action to keep guns out of the hands of those who shouldn’t
have them, such as by demanding background checks for all gun sales, including
private sales? How many mass murders
will it take to finally ban assault weapons?
At what point will the background check system actually be
strengthened? At what point will we
mandate safe storage of guns in homes with children?
Will
it take running gun battles in every town, every week?
From the City of Houston's video |
Will
every family in America have to lose someone to gun violence first?
Will every city and organization have to make evacuation plans for shootings, as the city of Houston did with a recently produced video?
Will every city and organization have to make evacuation plans for shootings, as the city of Houston did with a recently produced video?
How
much of a war zone are we willing to tolerate?
How much blood will it take?
Or
will the gun lobby continue pressing for gun deregulation and more guns in more
hands until we’re all dead or living in fortresses?
I
want to know, Mr. LaPierre. How many
deaths does it take?